Commit Graph
1 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
ksmithandClaude Sonnet 5 e80fe7d634 Fix Apple DH auth wire-order bug, add type 33 fallback, fix missing VNC password prompt
Live testing against a real macOS Screen Sharing server surfaced two
real bugs, independent of each other:

1. SessionTab::requestConnectOptions() never prompted for a password
   on VNC profiles (only SSH/RDP) -- every VNC connection went out
   with an empty password regardless of what the server needed. VNC
   now gets its own prompt; an empty password is allowed through
   (unlike RDP's hard requirement) since no-auth VNC servers exist and
   there's no way to know client-side before the security-type
   negotiation happens.

2. VncSessionBackend's Apple DH (type 30) response sent the client's
   public key before the encrypted credentials. Cross-checking against
   neatvnc's rfb-proto.h (an independent, authoritative reference: both
   the wire struct definitions and the full server-side verification
   code, matched field-by-field against this implementation) showed
   the correct order is credentials first, then public key -- exactly
   backwards from what was implemented. Fixed, with a new regression
   test that decrypts the credentials back out using the trailing
   public-key bytes to derive the shared secret, which would fail if
   the fields were swapped again.

Also adds security type 33 (RSA + AES, src/vnc_apple_rsa_auth.h) as a
fallback Apple auth scheme, sourced from the `asyncvnc` PyPI package.
Preference when multiple are offered: None > AppleDH(30) >
AppleRSA(33) > VNCAuth(2).

Neither scheme has been gotten working live yet against the specific
macOS Tahoe (26.6.2) server available for testing -- type 30's wire
format is now verified correct byte-for-byte against the independent
reference above, but the server still rejects it with a generic
"Authentication or authorization failure"; type 33 is rejected even
earlier, right after the initial host-key request. macOS Tahoe was
released after this assistant's knowledge cutoff, so there may be a
protocol or permission-model change specific to it that isn't
reflected in either reference. Documented as an open issue in
docs/PROGRESS.md rather than claimed as working.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-16 03:49:06 -06:00