The sidebar shows every DM's online/offline dot at once, but the only
existing signal for a presence change (member_updated) is broadcast to
a room's own channel, which Presence only delivers to a connection that
currently has that specific room joined -- never true for a DM sitting
unopened in the sidebar. Add a dedicated per-user broadcast
(dm_presence_update) sent to each of a user's DM partners on their own
per-user channel whenever their global online/offline state changes, so
the sidebar dot updates without needing that DM to be the open room.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Neither participant could get rid of a DM at all -- Leave/Delete were
both deliberately hidden for DMs during the initial build to sidestep
an edge case (removing a membership would break find_or_create_dm's
exactly-two-members assumption), but that left no way out whatsoever.
RoomMembership.hidden_at is a per-viewer display flag, not a
membership deletion: hiding a DM only sets it on your own membership
row, so it disappears from just your sidebar without touching the
other participant's copy or any messages. It's automatically cleared
(reappearing) in two cases: a new message arrives in the room
(broadcast_new_message), or find_or_create_dm resolves back to the
same room because either person re-opens it from the People list --
both count as the conversation being active again.
Also fixes two now-flaky tests (test_message_edit, test_reactions):
broadcast_new_message doing more work before returning shifted timing
enough to expose a pre-existing race where a per-user-channel frame
(desktop_notification/unread_update) could legitimately arrive before
a connection's own "joined" ack. Broadened their existing _recv()
noise-filtering helper (already used for member_updated) to cover
those types too, and used it at the two call sites that were reading
raw receive_json() instead.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A DM is a Room with a new is_dm flag, not a separate model -- reuses
all the membership/message/WS plumbing Room already has instead of
duplicating it. The room's `name` (still required + globally unique)
is an internal, never-displayed token derived deterministically from
the two participants' sorted user IDs (dm_room_name), which makes
find-or-create a single indexed lookup and gets free race-condition
safety from the existing unique constraint -- a concurrent double-
start from both people just hits the same IntegrityError->retry-as-
lookup path create_room already established.
Both participants get the plain 'member' role (no owner/admin
distinction makes sense for a 1:1 DM), which incidentally reuses
every existing role gate to block add-member, room-settings edits,
and join-via-browse on a DM for free. update_room also gets an
explicit is_dm guard independent of that, since renaming a DM isn't
just a privacy concern -- it would silently corrupt the find-or-create
invariant. DMs are excluded from both Browse Rooms and the admin
portal's room listing (fully private, per scope).
GET /api/rooms/mine precomputes each DM's other participant (name,
avatar, presence) as dm_partner in one batched query, so the sidebar
can render a DM row without a fetch per row. Frontend: a new "Direct
Messages" sidebar section (searchable by partner name, not the
internal room name), clicking someone in the People list starts or
resumes a DM, and the chat header/composer/RoomInfoPanel all render
the partner's identity instead of a room name where it's a DM.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ksmithandClaude Sonnet 5